Advertisement

President confirms removal of Villimale' banyan trees, promises 300 replacements

President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu and First Lady Sajidha Mohamed launch the 5 million trees project on June 5, 2024. (Photo/President's Office)

President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu announced on Tuesday evening that the two old banyan trees in Villimale' will be cut down, while 300 new trees will be planted across the island as part of the government’s wider reforestation program.  

One of the banyan trees stands near the Villimale' Police Station, while the other is located at the water sports beach area. Residents have long complained that the roots and branches of the trees are damaging nearby houses and causing structural difficulties.  

During a community meeting with Villimale' residents on Monday, a man raised concerns about the banyan tree near the beach. In response, President Muizzu called for an impromptu vote by show of hands. With the majority in favor of removal, he declared: “So, it has passed almost unanimously", and said that it shall be done.

The decision and method has sparked debate, with some residents and environmental advocates expressing concern about cutting down old, iconic trees that have become part of Villimale's identity.  

An aerial shot of Vilimale'. (File Photo)

Addressing these concerns at a separate meeting in Mahchangolhi, President Muizzu emphasized that the government remains committed to sustainable development. He noted that the administration has pledged to plant five million trees in five years, of which 800,000 have already been planted.  

“Instead of the two banyan trees being removed from Villimale', I have asked the Environment Minister to plant at least 300 trees throughout Villimale'. Now they are starting the program, 300 trees for two,” Muizzu said.  

Villimale', the least congested of the Greater Male' administrative islands, is known for its greenery and calmer environment compared to Male' and Hulhumale'. The banyan trees in question have been longstanding landmarks, but residents living nearby argue that their removal is necessary for safety and livability.  

Advertisement
Comment